From: "Ladislav Mecir"
> Hi,
>
> I feel, that Joel tried to warn us, that the "Poor man's module" is
not as
> reliable as some may need it to be:
>
> Rebol []
>
> make object! [
> protected1: 1
> protected2: 2
> if true [
> unprotected1: 3
> ]
> ]
>
> and he is right, because 'protected1 and 'protected2 will not destroy
their
> global context couterparts, but 'unprotected1 can!
I feel like I'm loosing ground in my understanding of REBOL objects. My
whole understanding has been turned upside down in less than 24 hours.
Of course, this means that I really didn't understand them at all. It
also means that it clearly violates the principle of least surprise ---
at least for me. How depressing.
--Scott Jones
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
subject, without the quotes.
