Gabriele Santilli wrote:
> Maarten Koopmans wrote:
>
> > It is *not* a Rugby architecture problem, but merely network management.
>
> That is right, but I can still see an architectural disadvantage
> of Rugby: it being client/server only. I believe fully symmetrical
> peer-to-peer connections can be a great advantage in some cases; I
> think I will try to integrate Rugby in a symmetrical system some
> day...
Not necessarily. Rugby is tine - you can run both client and server in one
app. It just doesn't seem to support permanent connections. It does so using
/deferred, but then you have to check back for the result = polling ....
-pekr-
>
>
> Regards,
> Gabriele.
> --
> Gabriele Santilli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Amigan - REBOL programmer
> Amiga Group Italia sez. L'Aquila -- http://www.amyresource.it/AGI/
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
> subject, without the quotes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
subject, without the quotes.
