Hi all,
It may just be my irredeemably old-fashioned mindset,
but everywhere I turn in Rebol I see the need to 'DO strings.
I've been ticked off before on the list about it and -- these
days -- I can normally see better approaches.
But this little example has got me stumped. So I'm interested
in how the gurus would unDo my approach.
The code below is the proof-of-concept, back of the envelope
idea that many data entry validation rules can be written to a
database as Rebol code. I just then need to write a single
apply-the-rules function, and add a little code for special cases,
rather than write buckets of repetitive code. But its got a
DO string in it. Any comments?
--Colin
----------------------------------
;; rules table
;; ===========
Rules: [
"(Length? to-string *) > 0" "No data"
"date? *" "Bad date"
"(* - 14 ) < now/date" "Too old"
"specialcheck * " "Not special"
]
;; prepare data field
;; ==============
RawValue: "5-122-2001" ;; bad date in this example
Loadedvalue: ""
if error? try [loadedValue: first load/all Rawvalue]
[LoadedValue: RawValue]
;; apply rules
;; ===========
foreach [rule message] Rules [
if not (do replace/all copy rule "*" mold LoadedValue) [
print [LoadedValue " fails rule: " Message]
break
] ; if
] ; for
----------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
subject, without the quotes.
