I don't plan a new release as Rugby is pretty stable and feature complete.
 I might switch to async IO for the server and the deferred part once it
 becomes available.


 --maarten
>
>
> > Thanks a lot, that's what I what I wanted to know. I also thought about
> push
> > (in opposite to deffered polling) IRC like behavior, but the question
is,
> if
> > it is really good to keep "channels" opened, as it will surely mean
memory
> > allocations....
> >
> > In regards to scenario you describe below - you can have several Rugby
> > servers running. The basic load balancing is - you simply loop your
> requests
> > thru all your running Rugby server instances. My question is - what
> happens
> > if you are trying to connect to Rugby server, and it is bussy doing some
> > task? You will block, till connection is not accepted or refused, right?
> So,
> > it is good to write server tasks in some clever way, perform some part
of
> > the task, and return back to main loop to see if someone wants to
connect
> to
> > us (and queue the request).Wasn't such concept present back in Rebol 1.0
> > days, called continuations?
> >
> > Or maybe you don't need to solve such situation, as the whole stuff is
> > pretty fast? Well, I tried rather complex db queries and I can handle 3
> > requests per second, what is more - odbc connection is blocking, so
untill
> > you get your query result back, you simply wait.
> >
> > It will be even easier, if 3.0 introduces more i/o granularity and
ability
> > to influence connection/disconnection phases, so maybe it will be
possible
> > to wait some 0.1 sec for connection, and if Rugby server would be busy,
> > discard it, and try to connect to another one.
> >
> > Anyway, - thanks for your description. btw: are you working on any
> improved
> > docs? It would be great to see Rugby mentioned on RT's website. What is
> > planned for next Rugby release?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -pekr-
> >
>


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the 
subject, without the quotes.

Reply via email to