Couldn't you still use his idea? Just put the a context and the maker/initializer function into your ride context. :) You end up with a context in a context in a context... but what the hey.
Anton. > -----Original Message----- > From: Ammon Cooke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, 12 October 2001 17:53 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Re: Backwards Navigation on path > > > looks like that would do it, but the idea is to create > ("sh..." <he looks > around to be sure no one is listening>, "RIDE") with only > one word in the > global context, 'RIDE. > > Thanks!! > Ammon > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gregg Irwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 9:22 PM > Subject: [REBOL] Re: Backwards Navigation on path > > > > Hi Ammon, > > > > What about taking a slight detour? Create a prototype > object and then wrap > > up object "instantiation" inside a function. Here's the idea: > > > > >> a: context [ > > [ b: context [c: none] > > [ d: context [ > > [ b: context [c: none] > > [ e: context [f: none] > > [ ] > > [ ] > > >> > > >> make-a: does [ > > [ make a [ > > [ self/b/c: "object" > > [ self/d/b/c: "second object" > > [ self/d/e/f: self/b/c > > [ ] > > [ ] > > >> aa: make-a > > >> aa/d/e/f > > == "object" > > > > Will that approach work for you or am I still off track? > > > > --Gregg -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
