Jose Manuel Alvarez wrote: > Hi, > > Has anybody looked side by side at Apache vs Xitami for very busy sites. > > I understand Xitami main drawback is that it doesn�t support HTTP 1.1 > so I imagine that impacts client performance when retrieving pages > with lots of graphics. What are Xitami benefits wrt REBOL, if any ? > > The other aspect I am not clear on is which is the best solution for > REBOL script performace, i.e. > > 1. An Apache native module for REBOL e.g. mod_rebol (not available AFAIK) > 2. FastCGI on either Apache or Xitami (with Rebol/Command)
I use FastCGI set-up here. Works fine, althoug there are some limitations if used under Windows, - only ExternalApp directive is supported. I can't compare its performance though, as I only tested Apache + FastCGI + Rebol, but several folks here use Xitami + Rebol + lrwp protocol, which is free and you can find it in library section of View desktop. -pekr- > > 3. LWRP for Xitami (with the script available in the library or other > solutions) > > Also, how easy is it to swap between REBOL an C/C++ code (which might > be required for some slow pages). > > Any insights would be great. > > THanks > > _________________________________________________________________ > Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > http://www.hotmail.com > -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
