Hi Ryan, > Incedently, > This is 3 bytes shorter: > > w: 100 print loop w [w: w - last random [0 0 1]] > > Of course more could be shave off, at the loss of readablility, but would > better > match the examples from other languages given. > And, losing the readability as you suggest, this is 8 bytes shorter still:
w: 100 loop w[w: w - last random[0 0 1]] 40 bytes, and counting, Sunanda. -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
