Hi Romano,
<<Romano>>
(...)
And how to throw and fire an error? If we do in your proposal:
throw make error! "my-error"
we do not fire our error! and if there is no catch, we end with an
(...)
<</Romano>>
I thought, that I described it already. If we use the [catch]/throw
mechanism, we can fire an error. If we use catch/throw mechanism, we don't
fire an error. These two are different things.
<<Romano>>
we must always use the [catch] attribute to fire-throw the error?
<</Romano>>
I don't see any disadvantage of that, use the FIRE function I defined, if
you prefer.
<<Romano>>
I agree, but I think that the function attributes implementation requires a
deep revision.
<</Romano>>
Aha, that is where you are coming from. I do not think that the revision is
needed.
Ciao
Ladislav
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
subject, without the quotes.
