Ooopps! Eheh. Small but significant correction to my previous post on this thread:
> For example, think about what the associated > meaning *in VID* is for each of the following VID elements: > - set-word! > - COPY > - paren! Should be> VID however, is more grammatically constrained than REBOL. So people *must* learn the specifics of VID. For example, think about what the associated meaning *in PARSE* is for each of the following PARSE elements: - set-word! - COPY - paren! Doesn't change my argument though :) Brett. -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
