Hi Petr Thanks for warming me up. I feel better. I like Maarten's idea to build a simplified rugby. I spend some hours testing the new rugby-core and updating my notes and you can imagine I was at least surprised by Maarten answer especially after his ...
>I invite you all to use it and test it, if you find bugs, report them to me. >I'll fix it asap. I think simplicity and consistency are important in software. You were the first to point that serve/witch [now] tcp://:9002 is not consistent with do get-rugby-service http://localhost:9002 And as rugby is now only HTTP, it seems to me that serve/witch [now] tcp://:9002 can be simplified like this serve/with [now] 9002 or like this serve/port [now] 9002 However Maartens own rugby. It's his baby. One he can be proud of . I am confident he will let us know if he wants some more testing and suggestions, or maybe just testing. Patrick ----- Original Message ----- Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2002 6:06 PM > Received: from trz.cz (ppp956.ostrava.worldonline.cz [212.90.240.85]) > by moon.moravia-steel.cz (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g19HNFS05639 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 9 Feb 2002 18:23:16 +0100 > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2002 18:10:28 +0100 > From: Petr Krenzelok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20011221 > X-Accept-Language: cs, en-us > MIME-Version: 1.0 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Re: [rugby-core release] > References: <001901c1b171$df08c800$3401a8c0@pat665> <001501c1b182$d374da40$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > X-archive-position: 16848 > X-listar-version: Listar v0.129a > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Errors-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-original-sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Precedence: bulk > Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-list: rebol > > Maarten Koopmans wrote: > > >Thanks for the tesing, but this is all known behaviour and won't change for > >know. > > > I am sorry I can't agree here. Rugby is very young. It is not used by > thousands of users to be reluctant to changes. Simplification is alway a > good thing. I am surprised by your statement, as you e.g. agreed to > "refinementise" basic functions. Still some function names/calling > conventions are confusing, so why not to change it? > > so e.g. > > serve/with [now] http://:9002 > serve/with [now] xml-rpc://:9002 > > could be informative, but > > serve/with [now] 9002 ; is also nice suggestion > > or even: > > serve [now] http://:9002 > serve/default [now] > > is one of other possible conventions, but following is surely confusing: > > serve/witch [now] tcp://:9002 > do get-rugby-service http://localhost:9002 > > Take it following way - if ppl ask, they are somehow not understanding > something = confused. > > So, please, don't lock ourselves with compatibility issues, especially > in very early stages of product development ... > > > -pekr- > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the > subject, without the quotes. > ______________________________________________________________________________ ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet ! vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP... http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
