Thanks a lot, Patrick! Now Maarten - why is there so much of a difference? I would expect some 3 - 5 % difference for the new version, not 1/3 of the performance ....
pat665 wrote: > Hi petr > > Following your request, I have tested rugby-core versus rugby-xpi. Here are > the results : > > rugby-core (http) -> duration 0:00:59.98 > rugby-xpi (tcp) -> duration 0:00:41.85 > rugby-xpi (http) -> duration 0:00:40.7 > > It is strange that in rugby-xpi both tcp and http give similar duration. > It is not imo :-) http is just tcp with some additional header packed inside :-) It was one of reasons why Maarten decided to go with http only imho - htpp is more general and it mean no performance loss. The overall performance is dissappointing though ... btw: I don't know what's with my computer, but I can't state following: do get-rugby-service http://localhost:9005 do get-rugby-service http://127.0.0.1:9005 instead of that I have to state: do get-rugby-service http://my-real-ip-address-here:9005 strange, shouldn't it work using "localhost" or loopback address? -pekr- -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
