Terry Brownell wrote:
> Interesting article. > > But I can't help thinking that that there's something fundamentally > wrong with all languages. Instinct would tell me that dialects are on the > right track. > I respectfully disagree - until there is a human - machine language that operates at the thought level the perfect language will never exist. > Here's a question. What is the end of all this? Or... if your > hardware/software could do anything, what would it be? > Program what I want, how I want. I am still waiting for a computer than can launch and maintain 100,000 simultaneous threads - roll on bio-computing. > Personally I would like to see... > > <begin rant> > I've made numerous attempts on this list to get organized and form some > think tanks or whatever, with nay a single response?? > > What gives? My only guess is that the Rebol community, or at least the > part that actually reads these posts, is really rather small. The "law of > big numbers" would have kicked in had their been a big number of readers, > and someone, anyone, would have responded... surely. > I've taken Rebol and created a 'bot' that can read, comprehend, and > answer questions on whatever it's just read (In discussions with > biography.com on that one) ... developed the world's most advanced > chatterbot, the world's most HAL 9000ish system on the planet to date (check > out a demo conversation at http://24.77.230.151/lfred/demos/lfred.mp3) and > yet no one seems to care? > <snip> > So I guess my question would be.. why not? But then the responses would > stumble and fall back into the discussion realm with things like the "Rebol > should be open source" garbage. > I don't know about others but I find it hard enough just reading the mailing list let alone responding to even half the posts that interest me :) -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
