Porter Woodward wrote: >Personally, I'm a huge fan of Mozilla 0.98+ (now .99) and IE 5/6. Both >browsers are fast, render pages well, and very compatible with one another. >NS 4.x version are all terrible - as a web applications developer, it's a >major hassle to code for NS 4.x - both in terms of HTML and JavaScript. >Things like CSS are actually rendered _more_ correctly on IE and Moz. And >hey when you use JavaScript, the DOM isn't all messed up. About a year ago >someone raised the interesting point that as NS had fallen to around 10% >market share, that web consultancies should consider charging extra to code >pages that function identically on IE and NS... Not that I necessarilly >agree, but it's interesting to consider when you realize how many services >charge extra for special cases. > Aprox. one year ago, when we started to design our company website, we considered NS 4.7 line (mainly because I am part of the team and I used NS :-) But we will soon look into the site once again, applying some css styles, with no care of IE 3 or NS 4.x. I use Mozilla here and I am fully satisfied. I used Mozilla on P300 too, and itpushed my comp to the limits, so I sticked back to NS4. It was memory issue however, as 64MB is not enough. OTOH, P300 is archaic piece of hw nowadays :-)
I would consider only Mozilla - NS6, IE5, Opera 5, when designing the site. -pekr- > >- Porter Woodward > -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
