It has the side effect of creating a new global word if the word had been
created with to-block.
Perhaps a more readable version of s-c? could be created with compose.
I use it in my own.
---
Ciao
Romano
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gabriele Santilli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ladislav Mecir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2002 3:38 PM
Subject: [REBOL] Re: [refactoring s-c?]
> Hi Ladislav,
>
> On Friday, March 15, 2002, 7:15:31 PM, you wrote:
>
> Reading your later posts, and thinking about it...
>
> LM> nonsame: func [
> LM> {
> LM> create a word equal to the given word
> LM> but not the same as the given word
> LM> }
> LM> word [word!] {the given word}
> LM> ] [
> LM> first use reduce [word] reduce [
> LM> reduce [word]
> LM> ]
> LM> ]
>
> what about:
>
> nonsame: func [
> {
> create a word equal to the given word
> but not the same as the given word
> }
> word [word!] {the given word}
> ] [
> use reduce [word] reduce [
> to-lit-word word
> ]
> ]
>
> It seems to work correctly for me. (Not that is much clearer, or
> better in any way --- just a different approach.)
>
> Regards,
> Gabriele.
> --
> Gabriele Santilli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- REBOL Programmer
> Amigan -- AGI L'Aquila -- REB: http://web.tiscali.it/rebol/index.r
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
> subject, without the quotes.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
subject, without the quotes.
