Hi Tim, > I'm designing a DB-based system to service a number of clients, > each with a variety of needs. My hope is to service all of them > with the same application, in which most of the custom code is > re-evaluated global data, rather than "code".
> It's been a bit of a headache to keep the "side effects" down. > It seems that every time I make a change, I introduce an error. > More of an OOP approach would make maintenance easier, I'm sure. I gather that your functions must do a lot of code ? OOP/Methods, when clearly designed, limits development by favoring reuse. This is one of the thing I need for my project. > My experience with Ansi C (large projects) has taught me that you > can do OOP with > any language, but it takes some thought and design. My experience > with C++ (large projects) has taught me that poorly managed or designed > OOP can be a major headache and cause overly-frequent recompiles. > In a word, I'd like to keep a thread on OOP going. Me too ;) > How can I contribute? Any ideas on how OOP could work in Rebol is welcomed... -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
