On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 11:53:59AM +0200, Gabriele Santilli wrote: > Hi Holger, > > On Thursday, April 25, 2002, 12:05:17 AM, you wrote: > > HK> any [ > HK> func1 > HK> to-none count: count + 1 > HK> func2 > HK> to-none count: count + 1 > HK> func3 > HK> ... > HK> ] > > That seems useful, indeed! BTW, since we are at it, would that be > more efficient than: > > any [ > func1 > (count: count + 1 none) > func2 > (count: count + 1 none) > func3 > ... > ]
I am not sure about execution time, but in terms of memory use it is more efficient, yes, because it avoids additional block series. -- Holger Kruse [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
