Hi Anton, On Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 7:12:29 PM, you wrote:
A> Ladislav, I disagree. I agree with Ladislav. A> I don't think this is an adequate proof. A> (You didn't observe the scan happening, A> so it's a theory, not an observation.) If you can find something that that theory cannot explain, the the theory is wrong. If not, it is an acceptable model. A> In my understanding, context evaluates its blk A> argument, and as it moves along from item to item, This, instead, can be proven wrong, and Ladislav just did in his last post. So it's not an adequate model to explain REBOL. I'm also sure Holger would agree with Ladislav, once the misunderstanding will be cleared. Regards, Gabriele. -- Gabriele Santilli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- REBOL Programmer Amigan -- AGI L'Aquila -- REB: http://web.tiscali.it/rebol/index.r -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
