From: "Cybarite" <snip> > I don't know if you got Scott's approach working > or not. He is using the more native approach rather > than what is in %http-port.r
Whoops. See, I was asleep at the wheel. Just call me native! to the core. <snip> > I did not look at their approach too long but I think > they are passing some parameters to the cgi message > that are then echoed back on the response. So the > original posting message already knows the logo, and > possible error or success messages. This was my take on the code. It seems to be a way to use a centralized, non-brand specific system, where branding can then be used to personalize the response. > For example, you can change the success message > to "has, we think, really been sent to:" I would prefer a message something like, "If the sun spots are not too bright and you *have* paid your bill, then the message has gone through." ;-) By the way, the "person" that lives at 416-555-1212 is really fascinating! ;-) > I think this is clever ... allowing you to control some output on the > response page and make your parsing work easier. > And making you a bit more independent of changes to the processing program. It is clever. First, I've specifically noted, but I have little doubt that there are more out there. <snip> End of my irrelevant comments, except to acknowledge that I was not paying close attention to the messages. Sorry!! (Scott gracefully exits stage left) --Scott Jones -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
