Hi,
>> x: func ['n][ [ probe n [ ] >> x 'a-path/blah a-path/blah notice the explicit use of *literals* the function must take path literally and the path must be given literally! HTH Ammon On Monday 24 June 2002 10:16 pm, you wrote: > On 24-Jun-02, Anton wrote: > >> One problem though is it still doesn't cater for the Reb-path, so > >> to speak. At the Desktop level, your... > >> > >> http://www.lexicon.net/anton/rebol/gui/ > >> > >> could be described as this... > >> > >> REBOL.com/sites/anton/gui/ > > > > Oh I see. > > >> and it'd be good if the Desktop could handle that. (It'd have to > >> drill down a page at a time to get there so it could find the real > >> URLs of course, but there'd be no need for it to waste time > >> displaying each page as it passed by.) A new protocol perhaps? > >> Maybe... > >> > >> reb://REBOL.com/sites/anton/gui/ > >> > >> Any other suggestions for how it could be handled? > >> > >> -- > >> Carl Read > > > > It's gonna be slow. The index file fo every part of the > > path must be read to determine the next piece. > > Yes, but it should be faster than clicking through by hand. > > > reb://REBOL.com/sites/anton/gui/ > > > > But it should be easy to work this into the desktop patch, > > using just a lit-path for now instead of a new pseudo-protocol. > > Hmmm. I'm sure it's possible, but how would you grab all the path at > the console... > > >> x: func [n][probe n] > >> x /a-path/blah > > /a-path > == /blah > > ? -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
