Check www.rebolforces.com/~erebol for an XML-RPC implementation.
Or: earl.strain.at for the the same one but CGI based.
--Maarten
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Sabin Densmore wrote:
> Yep, SOAP is free. Free and controlled by Micro$oft. Hence my immediate
> dislike ;). SOAP is cool, as a protocol, though. Web services are a good
> thing.
>
> As far as XML-RPC's data description? It's XML. So is SOAP's, as far as
> I know. I just thought that -- in accordance with the pronunciation of
> REBOL ("rebel yell") -- we do something with a protocol that isn't
> controlled by M$.
>
> Either way, one of the things I'm finding to be very cool/powerful about
> REBOL is it's ability to easily pass data to, connect with and otherwise
> interface with remote systems.
>
> //sd
>
> Petr Krenzelok wrote:
> > Sabin Densmore wrote:
> >
> >> I think even more interesting than working with SOAP would be to go
> >> directly to the source and working with xml-rpc.
> >>
> >> Being open-source, and the foundation for $OAP, xml-rpc/Rebol work
> >> could lead to augmentations if $OAP were necessary, but also point out
> >> to the open-source community that Rebol is darned cool and useful.
> >
> >
> > What do you do though if other parties decide to communicate using SOAP?
> > Besides that - SOAP itself is free too ... SOAP, however, is not heavily
> > used yet. XML is. XML-RPC is just transport mechanism, but you still
> > need something (protocol/format) for your data to be described in ...
> >
> > -pekr-
> >
> >> sd
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> ---------------------------------
> : sabin densmore
> : www.onegecko.com
> : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
> subject, without the quotes.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
subject, without the quotes.
