[REBOL] Re: fun with for loops

[AR]

How about this

while [
    it is true
] [
    catch [
        if condition1 [
            do something
            throw
        ]
        if condition2 [
            do it too
            throw
        ]
        do something else
    ]
]

or just use switch as it is mostly suitable.

AR

Anton wrote:

>Whoops, I missed an argument to 'loop:
>
>       for ... [
>               loop 1 [ ; only once
>
>                       if condition [break]
>
>                       ; other code
>
>               ]
>       ]
>
>Anton.
>  
>

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the 
subject, without the quotes.