Paul Tretter wrote: >Not sure what your doing Petr but make sure you checking for "none" when >using /no-wait refinement and not 'none. > I don't need to check for anything imo. The 'wait loop breaks, if false condition is met, automatically.
> "none" will be sent anytime there >is no data. > That's not actually true, I am sorry. When using: while [data: copy port] .... it will return empty string in no-wait mode, if data is not available, and none, if connection was closed. So to wait for data, to not process wait loop for those empty string, you just need: while [wait port data: copy port] .... that's all imo and should work ... What is more: 1) if you will search escribe archives, you will find message from Holger IIRC, telling we should not count on flag values, as they can change from version to version 2) do I need to care of how I desing my while loop, if open/binary/direct/no-wait works, while open/direct/no-wait doesn't? Thanks for your input anyway .... -pekr- -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
