Hi, Joel, > "G. Scott Jones" wrote: > > ... I cannot seem to locate the proper discussion. Maybe I've > > just used to many get-word set-word transformations on my thoughts > > and have mutated the source to where I can no longer follow a > > series in a sequential manner. :-)
From: "Joel Neely" > My fault again. I was writing both replies concurrently, but hit > the "send" button on the reply to your post, and then editied the > other one some more (and took longer at it than I meant). The > other reply is out there now... Sorry for causing confusion! No problem. I caught on soon after your post occurred. I just thought that I was overlooking a post. JN> > > Only in special circumstances!!! JN> The "special circumstances" being when test JN> is a series of series values. Although my comment to Paul was meant to apply only to the circumstance at hand, I had in fact forgotten about blocks of non-series values, so your point was well worth making IMO. --Scott Jones -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
