Robert M. Muench wrote: >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>On Behalf Of Robert M. Muench >>Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2002 3:07 PM >>To: Rebollist >>Subject: [REBOL] RFC: Rebol Framework >> >> > >Hi, just a short update: I got most of the framework running. I won't >call it a framework yet, because it assumes that you use the >"associative data model" and "nakedobject" concepts. From "nakedobjects" >I just use the idea about business objects and direct screen >representaton. Not the GUI part, as I'm not that convinced about it, >yet. > > I don't want to sound negative, but GUI part is imo least important. I think that n-tier rameworks has its puprose still, as such aproach provides you with kind of plug-in mechanism - don't you like simple storage? So just use some kind of db, while your above layer still can call the same function name and does not require to change. Abstraction is usefull sometimes :-)
Well, I will wait for more material from your part, but two parts I will be interested in mostly are: - FSM - workflow - what gets what state upon what conditions, where is it forwarded, what action occures, etc. - strong workload organisation ... - distribution - what model is used beneath the surface? Will it work upon IOS, will it use any kind of P2P? Any other server model? What workload is it able to handle? Will it be fast enough? Will it allow off-line functinality where it does make sense etc etc etc .. -pekr- >Anyway, before I will release what I have (only about 500 line of code >needed so far) I will add a graphical graph browser thing. Maybe I make >it to include toughgraph already. We will see... Stay tuned. Robert > > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
