Hi Sunanda, > 1. Parse is slow -- take it out of the critical path (as Gregg and Romano do) > or eliminate it (as Scott and Joel do). > 2. It's not the number of parse's (Greg has one per line; Romano has one for > the whole dataset) so much as the volume of data to be parsed
I do not agree. The greatest problems are in memory allocation. You can see my other message to verify the result of optimized code for memory allocation code under 1.2.1.3.1. I think parse is one of the more fast costructs in Rebol. > It's been fun! I agree. > Sunanda. --- Ciao Romano -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
