Hi List,
I think I fall in a very common gotcha. The starting point was:
test: [ false false false ]
i: 2
I wanted to change false to true for the ith position ( [ false false
false ] becoming [ false true false ] ).
My first attemp was:
test/:i: true
The result was
** Syntax Error: Invalid word -- :i:
** Near: (line 1) test/:i: true
I ran thru my Core.pdf, reading every line with a path word inside. I
failed. I was tired. I gave up. Isn't it too bad ?
Now I have found a solution
change at test i true
Does anyone know a better answer ?
Wouldn't it be nice to have a /at refinement for change, giving a more
intuitive (in my eyes) ?
change/at test i true
Patrick
________________________________________________________________
Etudiant: Wanadoo t'offre le Pack eXtense Haut D�bit soit 150,92 euros d'�conomies !
Et pour 1 euro de plus, re�ois le CD-ROM du jeu Dark Age of Camelot
+ 1 mois de jeu en r�seau offert !
Clique ici : http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/mail.etudiant
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
subject, without the quotes.
