Hi Jason, Anton beat me to the punch. I'm guessing your command aligns with the old View that didn't support image! types in a routine call. I tinkered with a few different things, e.g. using char*, string!, or binary! as the data type and converting, but nothing worked straighy-away like image! so I just went with that.
--Gregg -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
