Hi Jason, On Wednesday, September 25, 2002, 5:11:27 AM, you wrote:
JC> I do see a developing distinction and concensus from this. JC> Python [and ilk] is notable for readability. JC> One can learn a lot of Pythin by reading other peoples code JC> Rebol is first and foremost a writer's language in the same way FORTH is. JC> That's whay it's so good for rapid prototyping and fun too. I'll add another interesting difference. I'm not an expert of Python, but I don't think it would be possible to automatically translate (i.e. compile) REBOL code into Python code, while it shouldn't be too much difficult to translate Python code into REBOL code. Python is a scripting language. But REBOL is more than just that; I've always had a hard time in trying to explain this to other people, so either I'm not good at explaining it, or most people does not really understand what a metalanguage is. Regards, Gabriele. -- Gabriele Santilli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- REBOL Programmer Amigan -- AGI L'Aquila -- REB: http://web.tiscali.it/rebol/index.r -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
