>>btw, google does not find it, but finds your post which >>includes a rebsite url >>http://www.rebol.org/userlist/archive/504/648.html
> Hmm. I thought that there was not supposed to be a direct > link anywhere to that archive to prevent spiders getting > to it ... as email addresses are visible on those pages. Well, spiders don't get to sites if they observe robots.txt, which spam address harvesters most certainly don't. > I think that all dynamically created sites tend to be > invisible to search engines. Zope is an example. Not exactly. Search engines have avoided URLs with query strings for a long time, but how would they distinguish static from dynamic content? They cannot, it's all bits to them (and us, for that matter ;-). -- c -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
