> uhm, well - what's that? :-) Such kind of code it totally unacceptable > to me :-) I hope build-markup does not work that way??? Do you really > like the mixture of Rebol code and html that way? What will be the > result? Your visual editor will show both strings unless you upload your > page and let it be processed in production environment, where rebol is > installed.
hmm.. I tend to agree. But always people have so many different needs and workflow styles. To each his/her own tool. The more options exist for REBOL the better I think.. Personally, I prefer Olivier Auverlot's approach. You may too. I like it because it cleanly separates REBOL code from the html. It just goes cleanly within <rebol></rebol> tags. But, if the progammer wants/needs to mix code and presentation stuff within, of course they still can. Also there is now new session handling, a very direct syntax for cgi variables [GET or POST] and libraries can be loaded securely adn clenly to keep inline code concise and readable, without sacrificing feature scope.. http://www.rebolfrance.org/projets/magic/magic110.zip ./Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
