> In my opinion 'ML should be part of a rebol standard library, > and documentation, examples and articles should be attached > to each component of such a standard library.
I think the ML is very valuable. Though it could use some reviews before it became part of a rebol standard library. For example, I think that it can be more flexible by not requiring a compose. I suspect there are other additions which could give it more "bang for buck" too. I think VID is a good reference for the purpose of judging power and flexibility for effort. All that said I think the ML type structures have a good use for expressing a special type of tree and could be used for more than just markup - and at some stage should have a home in a standard library. > I've also written an article about DocKimbel's MySQL protocol, > [less illustrative and more chatty, admittedly]. > You can read it at > > http://www.frozen-north-linuxonline.com/pastIssues/issue6vol2.html > I love the analogy with the boat and radar. Very amusing :^) Sidenote: there's a broken link to "what is mysql" . > Both these guys deserve all the attention they can get. They've > made life easier for me. Most definitely :^) Regards, Brett. -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
