Hum. If this magic-char-thread is serious, could i borrow someone my
perl-interpreter? ;)
-Volker
Am Donnerstag, 16. Oktober 2003 15:06 schrieb Maxim Olivier-Adlhoch:
> > Andrew Martin wrote:
> > >It occurred to me as I was writing Rebol code, that it's possible to
> > >re-use these characters [], () & {}, in useful ways. I've
> >
> > noticed that
> >
> > >when I'm writing block!, paren! & string values, I leave white space
> > >before and after the [], () & {} characters. It would be
> >
> > nice to have:
> > >>>X: ["a" "b" "c"]
> > >
> > >== ["a" "b" "c"]
> > >
> > >>>X[2]
> > >
> > >== "b"
>
> more liquely [EMAIL PROTECTED], X#2, X>2, X\2, X.2, X|2, X,2
>
> one would equate to
>
> >> at X 2
>
> ["b" "c"]
>
> another to
>
> >> at head X 2
>
> this breaks no current rules (it might collide with mail datatype though?)
> and is a logical complement for the X/2 which we all use. If a specific
> datatype does not usually return a block (like a tuple), then it would have
> to do so.
>
>
>
>
>
> print ["my 0.02" (locale/currency)]
>
>
>
> -MAx
--
To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the subject.
