Hi Ashley, > > It might be useful to have both, making the SQL parser subordinate (a > > helper) to the SQL dialect. > > Not a bad idea in theory, although my impression after working with a > large variety of RDBMS's over the years is that very few people use > low-level API hooks when generic SQL equivilants are available. I guess > familiarity and portability are the big ticket items to most folks (IMHO).
I was thinking in terms of handling different SQL text rather DLL calls. In the dim dark recesses of my mind I recall Powerbuilder building different SQL text depending on the database (most was the same of course). Can't recall the specifics unfortunately. > It has been. Thanks for the stimulating discussion ;) Thank you too. Regards, Brett. -- To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the subject.
