Am Freitag, 7. November 2003 00:54 schrieb Ashley Tr�ter:
> Hi Max,
>
> If this tool / methodology / mechanism can deliver the equivilant of a
> CPAN to the REBOL world then I think that would be a good thing indeed.
>
> There are already a number of standards that folks adhere to, including:
>
> - word naming conventions
> - REBOL header usage
> - code indentation
>
> I see this as a logical (and unifying) progression, with the priviso that
> it probably won't get off the ground unless RT give it their blessing. To
> really encourage fence-sitters like me, how about working with RT to get a
> REBOL/Library (for example) document added to their site's documentation
> section. Once it's set in concrete like this it's a lot harder to ignore!
> ;)
Which means people who woudl contribute do not contribute because they can't
ignore the rules. And are worried they dont understand or do someting wrong.
Currently standards are set because scripts are accepted and commented
("better do" etc). If its reaonable, people adopt.
I don't know how strict cpan is.
A style-document is somewhere, aout your three examples. Then i like a lot of
example-scripts in RT-style instead of more rule-documents. IMHO people like
to copy style when beginning. Hmm, eventually rebol.org could mark
RT-style-scripts so people can look up "official" examples when in doubt?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Ashley
-Volker
--
To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the subject.
