Hi Tim, actually up until now I used to use emacs, too. But then startup times degraded so much (with all those added elisp packages which are so damn easy to install with apt-get), that I found myself to use vim more often for those "quick edits". After some time I decided to go all the way :-)
Kind regards, Ingo Tim Johnson wrote: > * Ingo Hohmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031120 12:43]: > >>Hi Tim, >> >>I _thought_ I answered that mail as well, ... > > > glad you got it. :-) > I might have deleted your response > along with all the ads for viagra and related products..... > (how *did* they know?) > > >>OK, I got rebol.vim (and am just now trying to find the differences to my >>version), and the tags file, and have downloaded most of the plugins you >>told me about (minus the ones neither vim.org nor google were able to find). > > > all on that list were downloaded from vim.org to the best of my memory > or from Dr. Chip's site > > http://users.erols.com/astronaut/ > > >>Give me some time to get accustomed, please ;-) > > > It may take some time, if you're not used to vim, but > it's well worth the effort. I find emacs of interest also, > in fact the emacs paradigm with elisp being kind of similar > to rebol promises a good fit - > > Volker is using emacs with rebol, last I heard from him. > tim -- To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the subject.
