Hi Jason,

On Sunday, January 11, 2004, 10:56:22 PM, you wrote:

JC> I was not trolling. And I am certainly not against dialects. Simply stating
JC> the situation as I see it - rebol dialects really have not been tested and
JC> used my large numbers of people in complex apps, so we donlt know yet the
JC> deeper implications of using them.

How many scripts do you know that do NOT use any dialect?

JC> One issue of dialects has come up here, is that while they can lead to sweet
JC> short code, dialects are only as good as their documentation.  Since one is

That  applies  to  any  language,  or  library/API,  or  class, or
whatever... I don't see it as a special disadvantage of dialects.

JC> Python is perhaps the most balanced language where write-ability =
JC> read-ability. Python's named function arguments have much to do with this.

Personally  I  don't  see  any  real  advantage in "named function
arguments".  That  is,  why  don't  you see people doing something
like:

   nam-arg-func: func [spec code] [
       use [spec' code'] [
           code': code
           spec': context spec
           func [block] [
               block: make spec' block
               do bind/copy code' in block 'self
           ]
       ]
   ]

>> f: nam-arg-func [a: 1 b: 2] [a + b]
>> f []
== 3
>> f [a: 3]
== 5
>> f [a: 3 b: 5]
== 8

You can also have "default local" vars with a little variation,

   nam-arg-func: func [spec code] [
       use [spec' code'] [
           code': code
           spec': context spec
           func [block] [
               make make spec' block code'
           ]
       ]
   ]

It's almost a one liner...

JC> With rebol dialects, success is a tradeoff between readability,
JC> write-ability, documentation, name-space and learning curve. They're a great
JC> idea, but not been around long enough to know how to use them best, grasp
JC> the trade-offs.

The  concept  of domain specific languages is not that new. Giving
the  power to use them to anyone is new, however. And of course if
you're  not  a  language  designer you're probably going to feel a
little lost. ;-) But anyone can become a language designer. :)

JC> I look forwards to seeing copies of O'Reilly latest: "Rebol Dialects in a
JC> Nutshell".
JC> Then we'll know they really arrived!

If  you  mean,  how  to  implement  a dialect, that's already easy
enough.  If  you  mean,  how  to design it, well, won't ever be an
"easy task", as any other design problem.

Regards,
   Gabriele.
-- 
Gabriele Santilli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  --  REBOL Programmer
Amiga Group Italia sez. L'Aquila  ---   SOON: http://www.rebol.it/

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the subject.

Reply via email to