Hi

> JC> ...whether it behaves differently or if its
> sytnax is consistent
> JC> or not with their expectations and the parent
> language.
> 
> People don't have to know that a dialect has a
> "parent language".
> What's important is that all the similarities you
> *can* leverage with
> embedded languages reduce the "impedance mistmatch"
> for users and
> makes it more accessible. The less there is to
> learn, the better, in
> most cases.

I totally agree with that. Learning a new dialect
(syntax) is not harder than learning a new API, at
least for experienced programmers who have worked at
least with 3+ languages in real world scenarios.
Having worked with Java and C++ alot I didn't feel any
difficulties in learning Jython, (and REBOL of course
;)

According to the messages sent to the list I learned
that REBOL is not OO. But it doesn't look to be
procedural or something else too. Isn't it an instance
of a new yet to be named paradigm??

Behrang.

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the subject.

Reply via email to