Hi Didec, you're completely right with the question of keeping clear the time dependancies of any piece of software. But discussions too will have to follow this temporally dependant scheme. When it will become available in a couple of days or two, just follow the very first three emails from the ML archive back in the thread dated from 23-juil 2000 Msg to Gabriele from Elan - 22 msgs are in the thread - Discussing about Contexts.
You'll then see the evolution from REBOL 1.0 to 2.0 - when related to the contexts. If I come back to time and versions dependencies of the scripts themselves, RT should keep back any REBOL version for download on which some Library script kept is actually or was then based upon until someone decides to modernize the script or retrieve it from the library. Regards, Gerard ----- Original Message ----- From: "Didec" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 3:13 PM Subject: [REBOL] Re: Easy-vid and New Docs idea --> Was Cookbook submissions ieda > Re: Easy-vid and New Docs idea --> Was Cookbook submissions ieda > Hi Gerard, > > I like your doc project, It's a big job and I hope the community will help you > enough. > > Just a comment about the doc/tricks/how-to you can collect and archived. > Take care to record when and from where you took the info. > > I just think of the future. > Rebol as evolved and will evolve again. > Certainly, piece of "first days" code are probably broken or useless in last version > of Rebol. And probably new version will act the same with actual "state of the art" script. > > So recording "when a script was code" and "on witch version" it was intended to run, > should be usefull info for future (2 years far) reading of your doc. > > Best regards > > DideC > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the subject. > > -- To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the subject.
