A part of the response is the discussion on the view 1.3 release project track.. : www.rebol.net/cgi-bin/projects/tracks.r?id=196&
----- Original Message ----- From: "Gregg Irwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tom Foster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2004 10:01 PM Subject: [REBOL] Re: any chance of a core/pro? > > Hi Tom, > > TF> it would sure be nice to have call, encryption, etc, in > TF> rebol/core. > > TF> is a core/pro version in the works? Why not? > > Do you want it in Core so it's free, or so you don't have the overhead > of Command/View? If the latter, you can get the SDK and use the /Pro > kernel; if the former, CALL *may* be included in future versions of > Core (I don't know that RT has committed to it for sure though). > > >From their docs: > > /Pro is built on top of /Base and includes: > > Shell - run external applications and commands > Library - interface to external libraries (DLLs) > FastCGI - fast processing of CGI > Registry - access to the windows registry > Encryption - Blowfish, Rijndael, AES, and more > RSA Encryption - public key encryption > DH/DSA Encryption - digital signatures and key exchange > SysPort - exception trapping and more > > > If you want all the commercial features in a free version, I guess my > answer to "why not?" would be, "How will RT stay in business if they > give everything away for free?" > > -- Gregg > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the subject. > -- To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the subject.
