Why REDUCEd? I am a bit confused now. Emeka
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Brian Tiffin <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 12:10:34 -0400, Emeka <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello All, > > > > This where I got my conclusion. > > > > I mentioned before that blocks are a container type. An ordered sequence > > of > > values. Actually they are an ordered sequence of un-evaluated values. > > What > > that means is that when a block itself is evaluated the values it > > contains > > are not evaluated. The values a block contains are evaluated when a > > function > > is applied to the block > > > > > > Is the last statement correct? > > Properly, (and I've proven myself wrong in technical discussions about > REBOL's inner workings on many occasions), I think a better expression > would be > > The values a block contains are evaluated when the block is REDUCEd. > > I think. > > Cheers, > Brian > -- > To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to > lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject. > > -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
