On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Jorge Acereda Maci=E1 wrote:
yes, you would need an either negative? ... But there has been alot of work on a round function that does all that and more. it should not be hard to find, and is slated to make it into th= e next major release. > On 17/08/2004, at 8:32, Tom Conlin wrote: > > > > > > > the simplest way is > > > > n: to-integer (n / 2) > > But that fails for n=3D-1. It yields 0, an arithmetic shift should retu= rn > -1. > > -- > To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to rebol-request > at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject. > -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to rebol-request at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
