Hi
I only received the message underneath today (!), and
admit that I haven't followed the discussion very closely,
so this might already have been answered/solved to
satisfaction, but here it is anyway, a patch that I use
for idates:
unprotect 'to-date
to-date: func [value /idate] [
either idate [
replace/all value: find/tail value ", " " " "/"
load value
] [
to date! :value ; original to-date
]
]
HY
Dixit [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fri, 31 Dec 2004 04:18:08 EST):
>
>Premshree:
>
>> Umm, looks like to-idate generates dates of the type
>>"Tue, 9 Mar 2004
>> 1:00:25 -0800" too, which would validate against the
>>feed validator.
>> However, this seems inconsistent(?). Maybe somebody who
>>has a better
>> idea can hack on this.
>
>You could fix or rewrite to--date yourself, if you wanted
>-- it's a mezzanine:
>
> source to-idate
>
>It would be good to fix it.
>
>I know the dates and times it produces are acceptable to
>many Internet
>applications (I've used the output of to-idate many
>times)
>
>But if it clearly doesn't meet the precise spec in RFC
>822 -- which asks for
>2DIGIT for time and date elements.
>
>Sunanda.
>--
>To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to
>rebol-request
>at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
>
Pr�tera censeo Carthaginem esse delendam
Write here:
--
To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to rebol-request
at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
