Hi Rodrigo, First, thanks for your thanks. It's good to be thanked, so thankyou.
Second, I would think that modifying no-white-web-proxy.r would be easier than writing a mozilla extension, because the code is so short. Depending on your requirements, you would probably cut out some of the basic ad filtering I do in there and make it even shorter. As I remember, it was also fairly stable. However, it would also be good if there was another person around with experience in building mozilla extensions, so I'm not complaining ! Anton. > Well... First I would like to thank all the attention you guys are > giving to me. Sice my doubt maybe quite isn't a REBOL's issue, you're > being so kind. Other foruns wouldn't even give me an answer. Then, I > will try to answer Anton, inetw3 and Ingo in this e-mail, ok? > > Anton, first I was looking for a proxy to do this. I choosed squid > (http://www.squid-cache.org/) because it's free and can act as a > transparent proxy, which prevents me from having to update each browser > configuration to send the requests through it. I was wondering I could > program something like a module for squid that could make the > adjustments to the pages. But unfortunately, it can't be done. As in > http://www.squidguard.org/intro/, "neither squidGuard nor Squid can be > used to filter/censor/edit text inside documents or embeded scripting > languages". Although I could try to build a proxy that does that, as you > suggest, it will be extremely error prone. I'd like to reuse things. As > I was trying with squid. Anyway, my intentions for this program is wide > enough to congestion the proxy server. There I thought it should be done > on the client-side. > > inetw3, as you said, "No matter how you intercept the html data, > something must be written in the html to start this process; cgi, asp, > php, perl, javascript, etc.". But that's the problem: I don't want to > change the original HTML pages on the web servers, like inserting > "<object>" tags. I hope there's a way. > > Ingo, my last hope of doing this on the client-side was building an > extension for Firefox. I know there will be a lost in compatibility > (since MANY still use IE), but I'm almost accepting that as it's free. > And your suggestion about greasemonkey was great! I don't know why yet, > but the "options" for the extension isn't working. Everything there is > disabled. Anyway, I will take a good look at it's code. > > Thank you all guys! If any other suggestion comes, it's VERY WELCOME. > Best wishes, > > Rodrigo -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
