On 4/14/05, Gabriele Santilli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >=20 > Hi Volker, >=20 > On Thursday, April 14, 2005, 1:12:08 PM, you wrote: >=20 > VN> i guess you made a typo and now we have a misunderstanding. >=20 > Well, no. >=20 > But, that is an implementation detail. >=20 > The position in series is kept in the value. So, S and B/1, from > the point of view of implementation, are two distinct but > identical values. =20
Now i get it. The confusing point is then, you put s in a series. that leads to the conclusion a series in a series is different. but you mean: a: [] b: a c: b d: reduce[c] now a, b, c and d/1 reference the same block and the words contain the same bits, but the bits are on different memory-locations. they "mean" the same, but they are not the same. i was using "same" in the meaning-sense. and then skipping sticks with the series, but is a bit diffent, so different for the 'same? - function. while an exact copy is same in the 'same? - sense. so i thought you want to demo that and forgot the assignment. sorry ;) --=20 -Volker "Any problem in computer science can be solved with another layer of indirection. But that usually will create another problem." David Wheeler -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
