Hi Volker Try seems to be safe in that case, as I use it in the same application many times.
Throw some-data has probably the same effect, as my second example was just a shortening. If I remember right, it was more like throw something to a function call a few levels higher AR Volker Nitsch wrote: >On 4/25/05, SQLAB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>=20 >>Hi Volker >>=20 >>Volker Nitsch wrote: >>=20 >> >> >>>Just curious: can you throw something? not >>> if .. [thow] >>> >>> > >throw can take an argument. it can also take no arguments (its >any-type). but i thought maybe that has an error. >if it is 'catch, try 'try instead and throw an error. >if error? try[ > .. > if not important[throw make error! "forget it"] > .. >] > > >'try is more often used, maybe better debugged. thats also the way >Ladislavs 'throw' works, as far as i see. > >Oh, and of course there is > forever .. [ > .. > if not important[break] > .. > ] >if you are not in an inner loop. > > > > I am always in an inner loop and I just want to use throw as Carl recommended instead of the classic C continue. >--=20 >-Volker > >"Any problem in computer science can be solved with another layer of >indirection. But that usually will create another problem." David >Wheeler > > -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
