Sure, I also do that when computations inside loops are not too complex... almost every time
But few times when the evaluation within loops is complex, with a bunch of nested conditions, that way of coding make the code looks really ugly. I hate deep nested code, even when could be short. compare the two codes, your example is more deeply nested. mmmhhh. perhaps I still need to shake off from my brain those line-numbered BASIC vices acquired when I was a child eh? :-) 10 for l=1 to 500: if peek(l)<>x then next:else poke l,y:next alberto On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 21:35:16 -0500, Izkata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Since I don't know of any 'continue yet defined, I usually just do > something > like this: > > (Using your words) > foreach item block-of-items [ > if not not-good-item [ > item-evaluation > ] > ] > > Not the best, and looks messy if there's multiple things that would > 'continue, but it works. > > -Izzy Boy Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
