I like the concept, but unfortunately I haven't been able to run the sample code in a version of Command/View. Not sure if it's a version problem or something else. (error says " Invalid argument: callback!")
Reminds me of some of the capabilities that Ruby supports natively. See article referenced at: http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/61035 Although it runs counter to the platform-independence dogma, it would be interesting if Carl reviewed and gave an opinion on his blog. As it currently stands, I imagine that developers requiring any kind of Windows integration or widgetry steer far clear of REBOL (with similar issues on OS X). Ed On 10/22/05, Benjamin Maggi wrote: > > I've been working in a project to add supporting for COM objects in REBOL= , > it requires /pro /command to work because it uses a DLL to perform > calls. > The idea of this project is to provide REBOL's the ability to "talk" to C= OM > objects not just a few one's but to all > kind of COM object ... > the examples show using Office automation, Windows Management > Instrumentation(WMI) and Internet explorer. but you can use COMLib > to perform other COM automation tasks, like Speech API, wizard and more, = If > you have to do COM interfacing try this one ! > > The project still remains an alpha testing stage. im working on ! > Feedbacks are welcome. > You can also find a discussion board on AltMe REBOL3, search for "COM > supporting" group > > Benjamin. -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
