Hi Gregg,

I ask too  : can we translate this in french, or rebolfrance ?
--
Charles.

Carlos Lorenz a écrit :

>Hi Gregg,
>
>I wonder if I can have your authorization to publish a translation to the
>Portuguese of this list of diffs at my FORUM at
>www.nobrenet.com/rebolbrasil<http://www.nobrenet.com/rebolbrasil>
>
>TIA
>
>2005/10/31, Gregg Irwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>  
>
>>Hi Peter,
>>
>>PC> I would like to ask if anyone could give a brief summary
>>PC> of what's the difference between Rebol and Ruby.
>>
>>Ruby is a programming language for programers. REBOL is a language
>>used to exchange information; sometimes that information is a script
>>for the computer to execute.
>>
>>Ruby has ~40 reserved words. REBOL has none.
>>
>>Ruby has ~7 datatypes. REBOL has 30+. Ruby has a number of standard
>>classes for things that REBOL does not (e.g. bignums).
>>
>>Some things that are built into REBOL, e.g. net access, are available
>>as Ruby libraries.
>>
>>Ruby is case sensitive and uses sigils. REBOL is not case sensitive,
>>and words (variables) can contain all but a few special characters.
>>
>>Ruby has cool block and iterator support, making it more dynamic than
>>some other programming languages. In REBOL, everything is data.
>>Evaluating data can make you think it's code you're writing.
>>
>>Ruby is pure OO, and has mixins rather than multiple inheritance.
>>REBOL creates objects from prototypes. An object in REBOL provides
>>context and acts as a namespace.
>>
>>With Ruby, you have to write in an OO manner (obj.method). REBOL was
>>designed to build dialects that let you express things any way you
>>want.
>>
>>Ruby has special built-in vars like Perl; REBOL does not.
>>
>>Ruby has regexes; REBOL has the PARSE function.
>>
>>The Pragmatic Programmers.
>>
>>Ruby has a standard debugger and profiler; REBOL does not.
>>
>>REBOL has built-in HELP and SOURCE functions, including full support
>>for reflection with doc-strings. Ruby uses a separate tool to extract
>>embedded documentation written in a lightweight text markup format.
>>
>>You can write Ruby extensions in C; REBOL can call DLLs.
>>
>>Ruby on Rails. Rebcode.
>>
>>REBOL/View has a built-in GUI system (full 32-bit compositing for
>>every face, 14+ pipeline effects, AGG draw engine). Ruby needs
>>to use something like Tcl/Tk for GUIs.
>>
>>Ruby is more popular than REBOL, and seems to be growing faster.
>>
>>REBOL can create standalone EXEs that have no external dependencies.
>>
>>A zipped REBOL/Core is a ~190K download; ~350K for View. The
>>one-click Ruby installer for Windows is ~14.8M (it contains extras
>>like Tcl/Tk).
>>
>>
>>It's not easy to compare REBOL with programming languages, though it
>>can hold its own on their turf. You're comparing apples and oranges to
>>a great extent. You really need to compare REBOL to Ruby+XML, for
>>example.
>>
>>Ruby is a blend of ideas from other programming languages, with some
>>new bits thrown in (no offense meant to Matz; Ruby is what I might be
>>using if not for REBOL). REBOL is different; really different; and we
>>don't know how to exploit it fully yet.
>>
>>Ruby is meant for programmers; REBOL is meant for humans. So, Ruby is
>>better if you're coming from Perl or an OO mindset and don't want to
>>stretch your mind too much; just get things done in a language that's
>>similar to what you know, with a few new twists.
>>
>>REBOL is great if you want to stretch your mind and learn to think in
>>new ways. It's also an excellent choice if you want to build Domain
>>Specific Languages (DSLs), which have been around a long time, but are
>>one of the "new" trends on the horizon from MS and others. REBOL's
>>built-in GUI system is also a standout feature, as is its small size.
>>
>>HTH!
>>
>>-- Gregg
>>
>>--
>>To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to
>>lists at rebol.com <http://rebol.com> with unsubscribe as the subject.
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>--
>*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
>Carlos Lorenz
>*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:
>
>  
>


-- 
To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to 
lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.

Reply via email to