Rod is right that the Advertiser story on Tickner and Hindmarsh may
not be all that accurate.
I have been told that what Tickner got to read was not the
envelopes but rather what Deane Fergie, Cheryl Saunders and her assistant
could remember of what was in the envelopes. All that was in closed
session. Mostly when asked about other matters at that time they answered "I
can't recall" so one supposes there was little recall of the details as
well. It is those fragments which Tickner has now. Doreen Kartinyeri did
not testify as to the content.
------------------------------------------------------
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words: unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission
from the
copyright owner for purposes of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."
RecOzNet2 is archived for members @
http://www.mail-archive.com/recoznet2%40paradigm4.com.au/
