Forwarded from Christine Howes:

>From International Physicians for Prevention of Nuclear War Conference

Medical Association for the Prevention of War Australia (MAPW)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mapw.au.nu

Conference papers from the XIII IPPNW World Congress held in Melbourne in
December 1998 are
now available from the web-site, which is continually being updated.

http://www.mapw.au.nu/congress.htm

*********************************************************
Gundjehmi Aboriginal Corporation Speech
Jacqui Katona
INTERNATIONAL PHYSICIANS FOR PREVENTION OF NUCLEAR WAR
XIII World Congress
Melbourne, Australia
 6 December 1998


I speak here today on behalf of the Mirrar people, my family and my
countryman who oppose the development of Jabiluka. I'd like to acknowledge
the Wurundjeri people, traditional owners of this area, for their liberation
is linked to our own and although is takes place in other forums we know
their experienced is intimately linked with Aboriginal people across
Australia.

My people come from Kakadu. One of the best known destinations for many
international visitors
because of the important and visible connection between my people and the
land. Kakadu is our home. It is the place which nurtures our families, and
provides us with obligations to protect and maintain our heritage, our
future, and our past. For us the threat of Jabiluka is an issue of human
rights.

Kakadu's unique cultural and natural properties are not only recognised by
our people but also by the rest of the world in its inscription on the world
heritage list. Even the World Heritage committee recognises that human
rights are connected with it's own Convention. It has said:

  that human rights of indigenous peoples must be taken into account in the
protection of world heritage properties;

that conservation of country must take place with direction from indigenous
people, and;

that the continuing violation of human rights places properties in danger
because of our integral relationship with the land.

The continuing dominance of government and industry organisation over the
authority of our people erodes our rights on a daily basis.

The debate over land in this country is fundamental to the expression of our
human rights - Aboriginal rights - it is a requirement not  only that our
rights to land be recognised but that it be managed consistent with our
cultural practices. It is from the land which our law   and power is
derived, it is the foundation of our authority. Our land cannot be
transformed as a resource, our land is part of our family,   it reflects or
relationships with each other, it connects our souls, it feels as we do and
it grieves - as we do -when our connection with it is impaired.

 If service delivery and administration of title to land does not occur
through systems of authority derived from our cultural base the lives of our
people will remain an international disgrace.

This is an issue which Australia is yet to come to terms with. There are
many indicators of the need for change but we have not yet seen the
political and economic will to respond effectively - to take the necessary
steps - to address the practical solutions which  will deliver positive
outcomes.

Instead government and industry have undertaken tactics of aggression in
institutionalising the powerlessness of our people.

Twenty years ago the Australian public supported the introduction of Land
Rights in the Northern Territory. The legal recognition of land ownership by
Aboriginal people through the recognition of customary land ownership
Systems. The threat that that recognition posed to powerful industrial
interests brought about the extinguishment of Mirrar people's right to halt
the development of uranium  mining the Aboriginal Land Rights Act.

Twenty years ago uranium mining was imposed upon the Mirrar and other
Aboriginal people in Kakadu. It is a testament to the lies and trickery used
to secure an agreement from Aboriginal people that now, ironically, leaves
Kakadu as a benchmark of negotiations. For our people this benchmark remains
at gutter level.

Extinguishment was reinvented as negotiation. This is a common tactic now
practiced by the Australian government and mining companies. Reconciliation
is the term now used for extinguishment. Sanitised human rights abuses now
stand as an excuse in the international community for Australia's inability
to genuinely recognise our rights.

The result of uranium mining in our country has been the average age of
death being 45, the second highest morbidity rate in Northern Australia and
at present the number of deaths in our community are higher that the number
of births. Our people no longer believe the whiteman is genuinely interested
in anything else but domination and exploitation. Our people have no
relationship of trust with        government or mining companies. Our people
have learned that negotiation is never seriously entertained.

Academics are used to build a body of evidence which completely overwhelms
the authority of our community. Academics design the paradigms and processes
by which we are defined. Academics have given policy makers the weapons to
institutionalise racism as  common practice.

In fact the great deal that was struck in Kakadu - the uranium mine, with
royalties; a township over which Aboriginal people would  have no control; a
Park, which our people were forced to lease-back to the Commonwealth; a
Supervising Scientist, to cover up; and a Land Council to obey the Land
Rights Act and the will of the Commonwealth - all these great institutions,
benefits I think they call   them, settled on terms to benefit the mining
company and government - is now called a social contract. Socially
responsible policy for    our people. So we have to see our land and sacred
sites desecrated to enable us to send our children to school, to have access
to   employment, to live in houses, we are
expected to sacrifice the foundation of our society - gratefully - for
supposed access to an average standard of living.

Land rights in legislation is a myth. It has been a myth in the Aboriginal
Land Rights Act and a myth in the Native Title Act. What is required in this
country is a fundamental psychological change - to accept that we people are
capable of devising our own structures, our own solutions, and determining
our own future. This has to happen at the local level all over Australia.
The reductionist process of politics will defeat every other attempt. We
know there is genuine goodwill on the part of the Australian public for the
injustices of the   past - but it requires the hard work and understanding
of every Australian before our future can be recast.

In continuing our fight we are labelled bad citizens - but it is not our aim
to be good citizens - it is our aim to be non-citizens - for if our actions
as non-citizens are recognised we will have begun, on our own terms, to
achieve a new path which truly reflects our future- not a compromise in
which we stand judged by other' values and beliefs - for it is those values
and beliefs which ultimately are used  to determine our identity, redefine
our past and dominate our future.

A warrant has been issued for the arrest of myself and my colleague
Christine Christophersen to serve a sentence for trespass on Yvonne
Margarula's land. We were arrested with Yvonne on the 19 May on the land for
which Yvonne hold title, convicted of trespass and fined. Yvonne is
appealing the decision of the court in February next year. We would never
entertain spending one cent on the fine.  We have done nothing criminal, we
have exercised our rights and if jail is considered punishment then it is no
sacrifice. The system has to be forced to recognise that we will assert our
rights and continue to protect our country - our non-citizenship is
strengthened.

 International scrutiny will continue on this issue. The World Heritage
Committee loudly condemned Australia's protection of natural and cultural
values - and indicated that other international conventions were also
relevant to the ongoing protection of indigenous ights. It is only a matter
of time until the most internationally recognised icon of Australia - Kakadu
National Park will be recognised  In Danger. It is only a matter of time
until the European Parliament takes action in relation to human rights
abuses and shoddy environmental standards when considering the source of
their uranium product. We will continue to fight the Australian government's
 pathetic loyalty to multinationals at the cost of our people. We know there
is a hard road ahead but we can not choose
any different life  - we have no other reality - but to protect the
integrity of our rights with action. In the process we hope that you will
join an enlightened and positive change as non-citizens to take
Australia into the next century' fulfilling it's obligations to humanity.

       Thankyou



-------------------------------------------------------
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:    unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/

Reply via email to